Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3615QM 2,657 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 88 2-Core 173 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 433 49% 384 Pts	64-Core 430 27% 430 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0CC) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.04% Terrible	Lighting 4.43 Reflection 7.42 Parallax 3.03 4% 4.96 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.43 5% 5.62 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.04% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung CM871 2.5 7mm 128GB 1,004 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT01D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 133 130 135 135 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 445 Write 134 Mixed 168 SusWrite 132 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 17.7 72% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 41.9 DQ Mixed 56 54% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.6 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-3615QMIntelBench 62%, 2,657 samples	30x
Core i7-3635QMIntelBench 62%, 2,986 samples	22x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	40x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	12x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GBSamsungBench 53%, 96 samples	14x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 740 samples	11x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 289 samples	10x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16