Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 21:36
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.5% Very good
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
79% 168 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 448
60% 443 Pts
64-Core 443
30% 443 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$428
CLim: 1605 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.2% Good
Lighting 226
Reflection 198
Parallax 238
60% 221 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 215
Splatting 141
61% 177 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 56%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$138
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 489
Write 485
Mixed 338
97% 438 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 47.9
167% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 173
183% 302 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 32
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 32.4
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 25.6
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,426 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $366
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $205Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $375Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback