PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B85M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151211 |
Uptime | 20.8 Days |
Run Date | Dec 05 '19 at 15:17 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670-$64
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
68.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 4527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 32 32 44 33 MB/s
|
30.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
270GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 129 129 129 128 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.7%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 188x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 136x |
Core i5-4690Intel $52Bench 67%, 73,695 samples | 132x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 114x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 86x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 83x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $387 |