Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '19 at 02:02
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 700
75% 596 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB; RX 570 8GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 67.6
42% 60.8 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 52
45% 55.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 105 75 66 42 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80% Very good
Read 475
Write 270
Mixed 330
SusWrite 86.8
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 32.3
146% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 180
161% 240 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
212GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 62 46 51 54 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 41
Write 51.6
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 51.5
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 69%
Jmicron Generic 500GB
227GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.2 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.1% Terrible
Read 7
Write 6.5
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 7.3
5% 6.82 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $263
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback