Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '19 at 17:18
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-9400F-$145
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
73.3% Very good
1-Core 110
2-Core 233
80% 172 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 578
63% 487 Pts
64-Core 578
39% 578 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$500
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 432
Reflection 356
Parallax 447
114% 412 fps
MRender 359
Gravity 362
Splatting 242
106% 321 fps
Poor: 99%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
607GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 887 983 985 1018 1020 1017 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,122
Write 1,218
Mixed 908
SusWrite 985
239% 1,058 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 61.5
193% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 1154
DQ Mixed 1,325
966% 1,257 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 220%
Great: 326%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$88
398GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 266 268 267 267 266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 480
Mixed 394
SusWrite 266
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 39
144% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 347
261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 124%
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB
73GB free
Firmware: Q0202A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 147 142 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 504
Write 376
Mixed 367
SusWrite 158
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 33.9
125% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 52.1
61% 109 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666C16K8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 23.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70%
Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $54
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback