Zoostorm 7200-0105A

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Zoostorm 7200-0105A (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte H81M-S2V
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150930
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '19 at 17:06
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 82 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 101 54% 84.2 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 302 30% 244 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 5.15 Parallax 5.16 3% 4.6 fps	MRender 7.24 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 6.13 4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 203 204 210 199 199 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 458 Mixed 387 SusWrite 225 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 79.9 4K Mixed 49.8 165% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 354 268% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 217 203 218 220 220 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 160 Mixed 139 SusWrite 214 129% 174 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 316% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 106%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 1,686 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2.5TB free Firmware: 050B SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 36.8 Mixed 32 SusWrite 11.8 22% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 104%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free Firmware: 0406 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 32 Write 37.5 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 11.6 21% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.6 236% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 152 152 151 151 155 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 148 Write 125 Mixed 73 SusWrite 151 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 97%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 38 Mixed 34 SusWrite 11.7 22% 29.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 197% 2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 92%
Seagate Desktop 3TB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 3TB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 37 Write 38.2 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 39 49% 36 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB 11,058 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 12.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13.4 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Zoostorm 7200-0105A

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)