Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 64.4 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 188 64% 116 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 528 54% 434 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 36.1 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 34.9 29% 33.4 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 35.5 Splatting 33.5 29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF360000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 82 103 65 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 434 Write 224 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 72.5 44% 203 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 0.9 39% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 6.9 DQ Mixed 24.8 27% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 14.5 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	7x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $198

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16