Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 527 52% 423 Pts	64-Core 1,195 74% 1,195 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 38.3 32% 36.4 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 36.9 31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 306GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 230 227 224 225 224 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.8% Above average	Read 240 Write 223 Mixed 204 SusWrite 228 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 23.7 84% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 171 132% 181 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 181GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 86 85 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 82.2 Write 77.6 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 85.7 56% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 45GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 132 121 125 124 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 166 Write 132 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 132 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 ID:80 CE M393B5170DZ1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4A-H9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 AD H... 82GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.2% Above average	MC Read 23 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 22.8 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.2 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16