Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '19 at 17:01
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 88.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 266
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 826
81% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.9% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 71
Parallax 62.7
56% 67.5 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 69.4
56% 67.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 105 85 58 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47% Average
Read 432
Write 211
Mixed 271
SusWrite 90.2
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 18.6
70% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 98
DQ Write 22.7
DQ Mixed 34.7
32% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
797GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 118
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 74%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
11GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 5.6 5.2 5.1 5.4 5.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 20.3
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.6
9% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.35 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.9% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback