Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U 8,291 User benchmarks, average bench 52% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 71.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 212 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 524 58% 455 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 4,933 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Dell(1028 0884) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.11.3 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 20.6 11% 16 fps	MRender 12.7 Gravity 16.6 Splatting 17.3 13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 12%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7512G 512GB 5,734 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 300GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 341 59 41 60 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 481 Write 355 Mixed 354 SusWrite 140 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 0.4 43% 11 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 28 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 23.4 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 97.2 41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples	25x
Ryzen 7 2700UAMDBench 52%, 8,291 samples	20x

GPU
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	25x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 4,933 samples	20x

SSD
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples	11x
SSDSCKKF256G8 SATA 256GBIntelBench 82%, 3,569 samples	6x
hynix SC311 SATA 256GBSKBench 78%, 22,335 samples	4x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBUnknownBench 60%, 6,415 samples	7x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 2x4GBUnknownBench 58%, 874 samples	4x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16