Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '19 at 18:09
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 217
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 479
55% 420 Pts
64-Core 480
32% 480 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$145
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 36.4
31% 34.6 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 34.6
22% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Geil ZENITH 240G R3 240GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1122A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 161 318 291 326 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 417
Write 4
Mixed 126
SusWrite 275
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 28.8
134% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 29.5
57% 117 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 89%
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
60GB free
Firmware: R0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 58 37 17 25 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 510
Write 424
Mixed 387
SusWrite 84.9
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 18.2
75% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 71.5
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 21.6
22% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$30
79GB free
Firmware: 12.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 55 55 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 35
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 54.6
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$59
353GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 95 96 96 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 86.8
Mixed 64
SusWrite 94.6
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 35.8
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 30.2
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 5,936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,038
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $197Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback