Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 APU 110 User benchmarks, average bench 27% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Memory 20.8 1-Core 12.2 2-Core 19.1 12% 17.4 Pts	4-Core 27.3 8-Core 31.3 4% 29.3 Pts	64-Core 25.7 2% 25.7 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 054A) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.78% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.98 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.78% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS128H37WM74IK3 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1225CE SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 148 163 166 144 151 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.2% Below average	Read 178 Write 159 Mixed 149 SusWrite 152 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 12.3 42% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 91.5 DQ Write 80.2 DQ Mixed 88.1 65% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 51%
Patriot Memory 64GB 1,048 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 19GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 24 22 23 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 24 Write 15.2 Mixed 13.9 SusWrite 22.6 25% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 53% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 2x2GB 1,493 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.62% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 314 13% 314 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.62% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16