| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Toshiba Satellite Pro C660 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA PWWAM |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100903 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 16 '19 at 21:20 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo T6670
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
|
39.4%
Below average
|
37% 54.1 Pts
|
8% 62.3 Pts
|
4% 61.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
|
0.45%
Terrible
|
0% 0.51 fps
|
0% 0.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 199 195 199 145 118 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
36% 159 MB/s
|
103% 33 MB/s
|
103% 137 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
15.3%
Very poor
|
13% 4.5 GB/s
|
14% 4.87 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite Pro C660 Builds (Compare 74 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite Pro C660
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 22x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 15x |
| Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 37x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 17x |
| GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $158 |