Xiaomi Mipad2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive17.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXiaomi Mipad2  (all builds)
MotherboardXiaomi Mipad
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1536 x 2048 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 29 '16 at 14:12
Run Duration68 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 20
2-Core 44
26% 37.4 Pts
4-Core 87.3
8-Core 87.4
12% 87.4 Pts
64-Core 88.8
6% 88.8 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba 064G70 63GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.0
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 151
Write 77.8
Mixed 102
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 9.07
4K Write 7.24
4K Mixed 4.91
24% 7.08 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback