| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Samsung PMASB09A Samsung DeskTop (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG DB400T6B-A2V/C |
| Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160504 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 15 '19 at 01:58 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.4%
Very good
|
74% 128 Pts
|
45% 344 Pts
|
24% 383 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
85% 97.7 fps
|
76% 94.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 413 387 151 151 153 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
79% 351 MB/s
|
122% 46 MB/s
|
164% 180 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
24GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.4 9.4 8.9 9.4 9.4 MB/s
|
10%
Very poor
|
12% 10.8 MB/s
|
125% 2.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.5%
Good
|
71% 24.8 GB/s
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
57% 70.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PMASB09A Samsung DeskTop Builds (Compare 21 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung PMASB09A Samsung DeskTop
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 8x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 4x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 12x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
| GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $76 |