Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190116
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '19 at 19:38
Run Duration	352 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A6-9500 R5, 8 COMPUTE CORES 2C+6G 203 User benchmarks, average bench 35% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 113 51% 83 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 113 15% 112 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Sapphire(1DA2 E411) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.3% Very good	Lighting 80 Reflection 94.1 Parallax 189 65% 121 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 118 Splatting 149 107% 127 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 198 224 279 291 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 1,130 Write 913 Mixed 838 SusWrite 254 175% 784 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 98.9 4K Mixed 69.6 195% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 269 200% 265 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 105GB free Firmware: JC66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 21 28 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 732GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 35 51 89 90 90 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 89.6 Write 60.3 Mixed 54.1 SusWrite 62.5 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 59%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 64GB 1,196 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 59GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 22 33 50 50 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 86.3 Write 57.8 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 36.3 74% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.9 191% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 40%
Kingston DataTraveler 150 32GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 30GB free, PID 1621 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 8.9 12 14 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	7.73% Terrible	Read 27.7 Write 11.1 Mixed 9.8 SusWrite 11.5 18% 15 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.73% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C15 2x8GB 6,416 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.8% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.2 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)