Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i7-6820HK 12,284 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.2% Average	1-Core 71.1 2-Core 119 46% 95.2 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 435 38% 314 Pts	64-Core 458 31% 458 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 6540) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 19.6 15% 19.6 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 22,374 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.U Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 368 Write 393 Mixed 276 77% 346 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 23.9 70% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 68.2 124% 245 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 110%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$40 175,353 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 724GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 107 106 105 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 100 Write 101 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 106 62% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 21.4 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.3 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

CPU
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 61%, 12,284 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 42%, 11,292 samples	4x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 123,202 samples	4x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 22,374 samples	5x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 32 samples	8x

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $120

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24