Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190807
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '19 at 14:14
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	KNA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	45% Average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 36.5 2-Core 56.8 35% 51.4 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 377 30% 267 Pts	64-Core 997 62% 997 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 28.5 Parallax 35.8 30% 33.9 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 35.2 30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 717GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 903 502 496 496 494 495 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$130 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 923GB free Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 408 409 407 406 409 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 404 Write 408 Mixed 323 SusWrite 408 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 19.7 65% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 200 169% 243 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 119%
Seagate Game Drive Xbox 8TB 760 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 54GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 34.1 Write 39.6 Mixed 29 SusWrite 38.7 26% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 324% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESB.M16FE 4x16GB 302 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	52% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 23.3 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 7.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 139%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	200x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	157x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	131x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	74x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	58x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	44x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	107x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	46x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $761

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16