Asus P5Q SE2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus P5Q SE2  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090429
Uptime19.8 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 10:39
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$34
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
1-Core 38
2-Core 45.3
21% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 64.4
8-Core 62.7
9% 63.6 Pts
64-Core 77.3
5% 77.3 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Asus(1043 830F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 3.5
2% 8.27 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 6.4
2% 7.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$30
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP0KI52H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 45 48 35 30 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 93.1
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 42.7
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
171GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 100 94 101 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 90.4
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 100
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 72%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
682GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 30 28 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 29.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 30.3
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
185% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 86%
WD Elements 2TB
681GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 27 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 29.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 28.8
38% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.42% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 1.4
5% 1.87 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5Q SE2 Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5Q SE2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $166
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback