Samsung 910S3K/9310SK/910S3P/911S3K

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 910S3K/9310SK/910S3P/911S3K (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP910S3K-KW2BR
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	51%
CPU Throttled	49%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 36.9 34% 44.3 Pts	4-Core 56.5 8-Core 60.7 8% 58.6 Pts	64-Core 80.8 5% 80.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sanyo(144D C761) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.65% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 1.94 1% 1.95 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000 256GB 448 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21K0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 181 188 191 190 190 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 335 Write 192 Mixed 168 SusWrite 186 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 18.3 63% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 145 129% 197 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 99%
Apple iPod 2GB 528 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 2GB free, PID 1303 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.9 4.3 4.4 3.9 4 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	2.53% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 3.8 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 4 6% 4.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.53% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4E8E324EB-EGCF 2x2GB 710 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 9.2 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 99.9 40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 910S3K/9310SK/910S3P/911S3K Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 910S3K/9310SK/910S3P/911S3K

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	12x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	2x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	14x

SSD
MZNLN256HCHP-000 256GBSamsungBench 73%, 448 samples	6x
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	2x
MZNTE128HMGR-000 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 270 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBSamsungBench 46%, 9,651 samples	7x
2x4GBSamsungBench 59%, 26,293 samples	5x
K4E8E324EB-EGCF 2x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 710 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16