Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140509
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 26 '16 at 08:34
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 425
8-Core 630
66% 528 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 847B) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.81
Parallax 1.78
2% 2.31 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 2.78
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 500G 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.4% Very poor
Read 79
Write 118
Mixed 94
22% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 3.76
4K Mixed 0.51
4% 1.64 MB/s
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
284GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
140GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 340
Mixed 354
88% 400 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 22
135% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 85.2
122% 229 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 348
Mixed 345
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 25.8
137% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 62.1
104% 203 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2015)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 117%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 163
Mixed 139
115% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 5.44
4K Mixed 0.88
233% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 108%
H/W RAID 5 6TB
52GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 99.4
Write 97.3
Mixed 118
138% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.05
4% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback