Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170628
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2665 0 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 80.4 1-Core 69 2-Core 127 57% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 361 35% 286 Pts	64-Core 582 36% 582 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2122 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.3% Poor	Lighting 32.4 Reflection 38.9 Parallax 27.4 26% 32.9 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 30.6 Splatting 36.5 29% 35.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 69 46 38 57 50 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30% Below average	Read 274 Write 139 Mixed 185 SusWrite 61.5 36% 165 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 27 4K Mixed 0.1 27% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 32.3 68% 133 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 70%
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 14GB free Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 154 95 50 92 52 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.2% Average	Read 224 Write 226 Mixed 200 SusWrite 109 43% 190 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 21.1 73% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 140 122% 181 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 390GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 145 143 149 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 139 Write 122 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 144 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 2x8GB 363 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 17.8 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	6x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	4x

SSD
ELITE 512GBZeplinBench 64%, 15 samples	3x
Agility 3 240GBOCZ $199Bench 52%, 10,165 samples	2x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3 2x8GBTeamBench 51%, 28 samples	3x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 76%, 42 samples	2x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16