Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 04 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E5-2665 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 66
2-Core 119
56% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 380
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 644
43% 644 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$230
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2122 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 38.9
Parallax 27.4
26% 32.9 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 36.5
26% 35.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 26%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 69 46 38 57 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Below average
Read 274
Write 139
Mixed 185
SusWrite 61.5
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 32.3
68% 133 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30%
Great: 70%
GOODRAM 240GB
14GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 154 95 50 92 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.2% Average
Read 224
Write 226
Mixed 200
SusWrite 109
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 21.1
73% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 140
122% 181 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$42
390GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 145 143 149 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 139
Write 122
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 144
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $205
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback