Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	16% Very poor	Memory 9.97 1-Core 48.3 2-Core 95.8 25% 51.4 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 140 17% 132 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 14A0) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 4% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB A950 256GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1225L SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 236 238 257 315 322 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.3% Above average	Read 345 Write 304 Mixed 249 SusWrite 266 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 17.4 66% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 143 118% 170 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 209GB free Firmware: AX0R5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 78 78 79 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 65 Write 62 Mixed 26 SusWrite 77.9 42% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GB 4,400 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 404 10% 404 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 40%, 4,052 samples	39x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	38x
Radeon RX 460 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 6 samples	1x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 4,400 samples	10x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	8x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16