Asus H110M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '16 at 05:34
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 91.5 1-Core 107 2-Core 211 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 403 54% 402 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 04E3) CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.11.4 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	37% Below average	Lighting 46.8 Reflection 51.1 Parallax 24.3 38% 40.7 fps	MRender 50.4 Gravity 40.2 Splatting 39.2 35% 43.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB 5,323 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1117 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1076 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 457 (AD) Unknown 100 100 655385 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 173 (C2) HDA temperature 72 52 206159544348 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2662 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4121 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5840 (F4) Unknown 100 100 10 (F5) Unknown 100 100 25 (F6) Unknown 100 100 490080	83.1% Excellent	Read 510 Write 497 Mixed 491 112% 499 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 95.1 4K Mixed 13.3 105% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 73.6 DQ Mixed 11.2 19% 35.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 320GB free Firmware: CC98 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 117829328 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5215 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 28999755 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6209 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3700 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 360783085707 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 38 5059892346905 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1420 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 9288 (C2) HDA temperature 25 62 12884901913 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 24 13 117829328 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 81015968110834 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2069878876 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1605510881	52.2% Above average	Read 106 Write 76.3 Mixed 90 68% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.27 4K Mixed 0.21 45% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 1x8GB 2,797 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	41.6% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 11.3 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	176x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	146x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	116x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	98x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	89x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	18x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $166

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16