Acer Aspire 4741

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 4741  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4741
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '19 at 20:33
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6000
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 92.6
43% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 89.8
8-Core 92.8
12% 91.3 Pts
64-Core 92.6
6% 92.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 0370) 762MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.84
1% 0.98 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.25 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ES2O
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 16
Mixed 21.3
15% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ10UE8BDS0-DJ-F 80CE M471B2873FHS-CH9 2GB
1334, 1334 MHz
1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 8.7
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 0.1
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4741 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4741

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback