Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 114 59% 91.1 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 201 24% 188 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 2,160 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Dell(1028 02FE) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	4.3% Terrible	Lighting 5.17 Reflection 7.42 Parallax 3.34 4% 5.31 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 7 4% 5.28 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.3% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 119 131 119 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 158 Write 173 Mixed 154 SusWrite 122 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 18 68% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 70.7 DQ Mixed 28.2 27% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 10.9 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10.4 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 2,160 samples	47x
Mobility Radeon HD 5730AMDBench 4%, 2,535 samples	20x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	3x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $98Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	4x
SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 36%, 2,036 samples	3x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	3x

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $248

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16