Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% SOCKET775 M/B, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	Memory 1.1 1-Core 33.4 2-Core 56.4 14% 30.3 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 103 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 5.19 Parallax 3.75 3% 4.36 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 3.43 4% 4.66 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 69 70 36 46 62 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.3% Very poor	Read 95.6 Write 142 Mixed 89.8 SusWrite 62.8 22% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 4.7 30% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 65.6 DQ Mixed 26 25% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.06% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.7 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 0.2 2% 0.8 GB/s	Latency 495 8% 495 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.06% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 69%, 17 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $350

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16