To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-6657
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090922
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 19:08
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 58.3
35% 51.1 Pts
4-Core 60.8
8-Core 60.1
8% 60.4 Pts
64-Core 51.4
3% 51.4 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia ION
MSI(1462 4570) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.22
1% 0.85 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.29 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 141 165 162 172 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 165
Write 90.8
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 159
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 8.7
36% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 102%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
87GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 29 28 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 26
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 27.4
32% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB
14GB free, PID 0159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.8 9.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.93% Terrible
Read 19
Write 10.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 9.7
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
58% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16HTF51264HZ-800C1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM 2048 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.97 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback