Lenovo 4157B41

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4157B41  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '16 at 14:43
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3540
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 102
49% 77 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 375
35% 293 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800
Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 342.0
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.05% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 1.66
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 7.29
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 4.48
4% 5.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.05%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 129
Write 130
Mixed 118
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.33
84% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.3
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback