Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 20:59
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 182
59% 109 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 256
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 59.9
56% 64.9 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 66.6
55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 290 293 294 294 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 369
Write 338
Mixed 326
SusWrite 292
75% 331 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 40.4
135% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 293
224% 303 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 124%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
169GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 52 52 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 58
Write 59
Mixed 46
SusWrite 52.2
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
467GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 146 144 142 142 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 84.8
Write 134
Mixed 40
SusWrite 143
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
67% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1TB
255GB free
Firmware: 0412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 10 10 11 9.8 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 72.8
Write 7.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 10.1
18% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 58%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
17GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 24.3
Mixed 5.3
12% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 15.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 19.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $218
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback