HP 500-134eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP 500-134eo  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 15:33
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$80
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 146
57% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 257
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 246
16% 246 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 83F4) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 45 34 40 23 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 110
SusWrite 37.9
22% 96 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 12.3
64% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 15.8
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 17.7
14% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Nanya NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.4
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $187Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback