PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Hyrican PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Micro-Star A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171205 |
Uptime | 7.8 Days |
Run Date | Oct 19 '19 at 10:03 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team L5 lite 120GB SSD
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0120B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 12 9.3 27 5.9 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$33
398GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 135 161 137 148 MB/s
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 149x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 99x |
Core i7-8700KIntel $198Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 86x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 100x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 70x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 67x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $319 |