Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Memory 41.2 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 85.5 33% 56.4 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 170 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.35% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 2.73 Parallax 1.56 2% 2.15 fps	MRender 4.71 Gravity 2.13 Splatting 5.52 4% 4.12 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.35% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 128GB NS550-2242 128GB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0927A SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 148 150 150 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 384 Write 135 Mixed 152 SusWrite 146 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 9.3 58% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 56.5 73% 132 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB 1,884 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 10.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	12x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	12x

SSD
128GB NS550-2242 128GBTeclastBench 45%, 331 samples	7x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	2x
256GB 256GBDogfishBench 69%, 890 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x1.5GBABCDBench 24%, 1,884 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16