PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170915 |
Uptime | 8.7 Days |
Run Date | Oct 17 '19 at 21:56 |
Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
Run User | ARE-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
70.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 404 455 477 478 476 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C15 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
62%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 559x |
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 527x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 470x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 216x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 199x |
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples | 123x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $864 |