Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z270P-D3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '19 at 12:25
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	UZB-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G3900-$36 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 179 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 182 24% 181 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 30.6 Parallax 39.2 27% 34.3 fps	MRender 42.6 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 34.6 31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 169 157 74 113 156 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 34.3 Write 157 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 137 66% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.3 75% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 103%
AI Mass Storage 32GB 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 26GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	7.04% Terrible	Read 22.4 Write 12.3 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 13.4 18% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.04% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	38.4% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 2,428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	662x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	381x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	273x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	255x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	242x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	210x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	60x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	102x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	74x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $484

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16