Asus Z87M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus Z87M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 18:55
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-4790-$318
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61.2% Good
1-Core 101
2-Core 185
68% 143 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 372
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 383
26% 383 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 113
Reflection 93
Parallax 92.3
28% 99.4 fps
MRender 79.7
Gravity 116
Splatting 80
30% 91.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$53
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 227 242 243 258 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 114
SusWrite 228
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 12.4
40% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 49.4
DQ Write 49.5
DQ Mixed 39.6
32% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
542GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 91 89 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 88
Mixed 53
SusWrite 90.4
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 71%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
9GB free
Firmware: 04.05G11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 88 93 96 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 86.7
Write 79
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 89.2
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$4
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.8 4.5 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2.8
Write 0.8
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 3.7
3% 2.38 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 24%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown DDR3 1600 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1360 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
24% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24%
Great: 35%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z87M-PLUS - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $816
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback