Digilite DL-A55M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDigilite DL-A55M  (all builds)
MotherboardDIGILITE DL-A55M
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 12:04
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3400 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 75
40% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 83.2
8-Core 81.2
11% 82.2 Pts
64-Core 83.4
5% 83.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
Device(105B 0D7E) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
1.65% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.19 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.53
Splatting 2.43
2% 2.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.65%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 23.3
59% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
137GB free
Firmware: 2BA30010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 56.6
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron V01D3L84GB52852813 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback