Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HQ 33,920 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 44.9 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 44.6 26% 38.1 Pts	4-Core 78.9 8-Core 111 12% 95 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300 SATA 512GB 321 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20121P00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 385 379 395 367 391 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 338 Write 345 Mixed 292 SusWrite 382 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 14.6 51% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 192 142% 187 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KMKYF9-MIB 4x8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	45% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 20.1 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	353x
Quadro P3000NvidiaBench 40%, 1,198 samples	264x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	242x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	100x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	76x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	48x

RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 4,851 samples	126x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 27,567 samples	88x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 4x16GBUnknownBench 80%, 298 samples	58x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16