Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180807
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '19 at 02:18
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 179 62% 108 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 485 49% 399 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% ASRock(1849 5031) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.3 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.3% Average	Lighting 56.6 Reflection 64.6 Parallax 72.7 46% 64.6 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 56 Splatting 53.3 47% 57.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN139B SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 905 901 947 957 945 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 1,144 Write 881 Mixed 854 SusWrite 926 214% 951 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 48.3 158% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 642 DQ Write 417 DQ Mixed 546 402% 535 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 234%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 464GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 435 434 434 432 434 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 442 Mixed 379 SusWrite 435 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 38.3 128% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GB 634 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	93.7% Outstanding	MC Read 35.1 MC Write 41.6 MC Mixed 36.4 108% 37.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.8 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	268x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	143x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	114x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	63x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	35x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16