IBM eServer x3400-[642917G]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemIBM eServer x3400-[642917G]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM M97IP
Memory18.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090302
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 08 '19 at 14:14
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5410
LGA 771, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 66.1
36% 53.9 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 500GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 189 195 198 194 189 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.3% Below average
Read 303
Write 241
Mixed 270
SusWrite 194
57% 252 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 1
43% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 2.8
DQ Write 29.3
DQ Mixed 6.9
8% 13 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback