Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130829
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '19 at 10:57
Run Duration	421 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110 23,169 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 23.5 2-Core 168 56% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 598 57% 470 Pts	64-Core 619 38% 619 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 136 Parallax 126 102% 129 fps	MRender 99 Gravity 127 Splatting 104 90% 110 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 664GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 85 84 82 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 323 Write 156 Mixed 200 SusWrite 82.9 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 32.5 104% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 57.4 DQ Mixed 41.1 44% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 61GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 94 88 82 92 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 316 Write 148 Mixed 174 SusWrite 88.9 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 31.2 104% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36.2 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 43.4 33% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 146GB free Firmware: CC4A SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 89 88 90 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 62.3 Write 71.4 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 88.3 51% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 1,490 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 36.1 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 57.8 69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	542x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	385x
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	35x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	33x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 505 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $896

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16