| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160921 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 03 '19 at 09:31 |
| Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 66% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45.9%
Average
|
48% 85.4 Pts
|
40% 294 Pts
|
14% 223 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.8%
Average
|
49% 59.1 fps
|
50% 61.1 fps
| |
|
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
|
6.45%
Terrible
|
6% 7.61 fps
|
8% 8.73 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 3.9 8.3 18 71 66 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
20% 91.8 MB/s
|
54% 18.4 MB/s
|
73% 123 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
865GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 154 147 153 146 152 MB/s
|
90.2%
Outstanding
|
100% 137 MB/s
|
201% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
25.6%
Poor
|
27% 9.5 GB/s
|
16% 5.67 GB/s
|
20% 202 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 621 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 147x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 130x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 97x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 120x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 55x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $337 |