Foxconn H55MXV Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H55MXV Series  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '19 at 12:07
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3 540-$120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.2% Poor
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 84.9
32% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 124
18% 127 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$280
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 220
Reflection 197
Parallax 213
58% 210 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 213
Splatting 168
58% 175 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 61%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC12.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 18 22 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 93%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.9
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 37%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H55MXV Series Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Foxconn H55MXV Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $120
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback