Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130427
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '19 at 20:56
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 192 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 361 48% 359 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.28% Terrible	Lighting 5.07 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 4.88 4% 4.83 fps	MRender 6.48 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.22 5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.28% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 340 351 352 353 353 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	78% Very good	Read 366 Write 332 Mixed 343 SusWrite 349 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 38.4 123% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 40.1 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 53.4 47% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 123%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 453GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 104 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 91.1 Write 92 Mixed 64.9 SusWrite 103 65% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 526GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 62 69 69 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 74.6 Write 51.8 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 64.3 45% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 67%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 551GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 87 95 95 95 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 119 Write 132 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 93.1 66% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 113GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 68 70 70 68 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 67.5 Write 68.4 Mixed 40.6 SusWrite 69.2 45% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 43%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 47GB free Firmware: 3.AFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 45 46 46 47 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 70.3 Write 52.8 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 46.1 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 2x4GB 1,649 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.9 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	156x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	48x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16