Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '19 at 01:14
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$249 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 93.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 235 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 906 78% 669 Pts	64-Core 932 58% 932 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 12FF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 23 Parallax 18.7 16% 20.5 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 26 20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 960GB 3,578 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 610GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1210A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 418 435 435 435 362 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 408 Mixed 358 SusWrite 416 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 27.2 126% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 41.2 87% 172 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 106%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 109GB free Firmware: V8X01b10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 383 386 385 388 376 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 393 Write 346 Mixed 330 SusWrite 383 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 33.7 124% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 175 133% 175 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FB Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.M8FB 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 27 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 25.4 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	881x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	545x
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	470x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	284x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	243x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	149x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	131x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	88x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $535

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16