PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180529 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 17 '19 at 16:17 |
Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G3900-$36
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
48%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
Asus(1043 0501) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
CF120GB 120GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1222A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 28 12 17 43 38 MB/s
|
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
24GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 7.4 11 11 11 10 MB/s
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 78.BAGN8.ARC0B 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 199x |
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 107x |
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 105x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 125x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 90x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 59x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |