Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '16 at 11:40
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2125-$152 639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 89 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 156 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 225 30% 225 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz) 8,807 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 844D) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.91% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 1.41 2% 2.22 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.87 2% 2.65 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.91% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 90 90 12893826 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 -121685013404321 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3934 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 14 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 12893826 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 12893826 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 12893826 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 25366 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20335 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20335 (F2) Unknown 0 0 33188	51.2% Above average	Read 291 Write 108 Mixed 143 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 13.1 104% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 31 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 10.5 27% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 82%
Seagate ST3200826AS 200GB 2,004 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 31GB free Firmware: 3.06 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 59 45 210667608 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9565 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 610222172 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 46454 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5225 (C2) HDA temperature 36 61 42949672996 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 45 210667608 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30.8% Below average	Read 53.1 Write 54.1 Mixed 20.9 31% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.33 79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.9% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.8 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	160x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	50x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16