Asrock A75M-HVS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsrock A75M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1842x1014x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 15:46
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon II X4 651
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27% Poor
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 95.6
34% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 152
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 136
9% 136 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 355A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 106
Reflection 83.4
Parallax 134
28% 108 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 128
Splatting 75.5
35% 100 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 37%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$31
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 50 52 99 104 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 107
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 81.7
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$24
148GB free
Firmware: 21.12M22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 68 71 69 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 68.2
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 69
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$38
124GB free
Firmware: 8.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 31 30 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 16.1
Write 34.6
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 30.2
18% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.2
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A75M-HVS Builds (Compare 390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A75M-HVS - $238

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $374
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback