Notebook NH50_70RH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemNotebook NH50_70RH  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NH50_70RH
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '19 at 10:24
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 83
2-Core 166
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 440
48% 382 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8553) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7107
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 9.73
Parallax 7.28
4% 7.33 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 6.23
Splatting 13.3
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1331 1213 838 842 844 841 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,161
Write 1,067
Mixed 1,046
SusWrite 985
240% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 64.6
222% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 629
DQ Mixed 750
553% 730 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 207%
Great: 355%
Corsair Voyager GTX 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 87 91 91 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 327
Write 90
Mixed 132
SusWrite 88.8
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 7.9
37% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 8.4
20% 43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 31 16 14 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 102
Write 27.8
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 24.8
56% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
87% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905630-066.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH50_70RH Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook NH50_70RH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $43
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback