Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 17:42
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 93.9
49% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 186
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 35
31% 33.1 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 33.1
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 102 104 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.4% Above average
Read 221
Write 202
Mixed 191
SusWrite 102
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 39.4
129% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 52.9
DQ Mixed 49.3
36% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
765GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 104 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 120
Write 134
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 104
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
341GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 64 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 64.4
Write 60.4
Mixed 50
SusWrite 64.2
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 69%
Samsung G3 Station 1.5TB
23GB free, PID 6013
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 24
Write 14
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 24.5
27% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
33.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.2
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback